Since the implementation of currently validated serological (blood) tests, there has been only one nationally reported case where a donor's tissue was found to be the source of a virally transmitted infection, Hepatitis C. The initial testing of the donor was negative, but subsequent tests were positive. There are 26 documented cases of bacterial infection in the past 10 yrs. In 1999 alone, 750,000 allografts were surgically implanted.
There were three reported cases in 2001 of patient deaths after the surgical implantation of allograft tissue in knee surgeries. That report by the CDC sparked a resurgent interest in allograft tissue safety and increasing scrutiny by the FDA and American Association of Tissue Banks.
|
|
|
| |
||
|
|
Recovery Time: Time elapsed between death and Tissue Procurement (harvest). Usu. < 24 hrs.
This process minimizes contamination of tissue at the tissue bank, but it does not eliminate contamination originating from the donor that might already be present. It reduces graft contamination from the environment, processing personnel and equipment. As stated in the March 2002 issue of the CDC's MMWR, "aseptically processed tissue should not be considered sterile, and health-care providers should be informed of the possible risk for bacterial infection."
Serologic testing for virus; physical exam of the donor, medical history review; bacterial and fungal cultures; a final decision to accept or reject the tissue for transplantation.
Using current screening and testing protocols, the risk of implanting tissue from an HIV-infected donor is less than 1:1,000,000. The risk for Hepatitis B or C is higher, because of the greater number of people affected and because of limitations in testing methods. Human errors in screening and processing can also be factors.
Human cadaveric tissue is not as easily sterilized as metals or plastics. Often, ethylene oxide or gamma irradiation are used, but these techniques can have adverse effects on the tissue. Care must be taken not to destroy the mechanical properties & strength of the musculoskeletal tissue while it's being processed. There are several tissue-processing techniques, used by various tissue banks. To date, the safety and efficacy of these techniques have not been scientifically established. The FDA is scientifically reviewing validations of these processes now.
Allowash (Lifenet): uses ultrasonics, centrifugation, negative pressure, reagents, biological detergents, alcohols and hydrogen peroxide.
Cryopreservation (CryoLife): incubates tissue in antiobiotics for 24 hrs, then freezes to -137 C.
Biocleanse (Regeneration Technologies.): avoids use of excess heat, irradiation or ethylene oxide. Low temperature chemical sterilization, which claims to completely penetrate tissue and eliminate contaminants from the graft.
Clearant Process (Clearant, Inc): radiation, freezing, water extraction, stabilizers, and anti-oxidants such as Vitamin A and C. From Clearant's promotional material: This is the only final packaging inactivation methodology that offers allograft sterility equal to OR ready medical devices with no tissue damage, inactivates all types of microbial pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, fungi and spores, without impacting the structural or biomechanical integrity of the allograft.
Clearant's Patented Allograft Sterilization Process
Despite rigorous screening and processing, there is a small chance that allograft tissues donated from cadavers still contain bacteria such as Clostridium sordellii, or viruses such as HIV or hepatitis C.
To meet the growing demand for safe allograft transplants, biomedical companies have been working on ways to reduce the risk of undetected infections. The Clearant Process, which sterilizes allograft tissues, subjects devitalized types of tissue, such as tendons, ligaments, and bone grafts, to an extremely high does of gamma radiation, up to 50kGy. More standard sterilization processes expose allograft tissues to one third of those levels, somewhere between 15 and 20kGy. While the lower dose of gamma irradiation has maintained the tissue's biological properties, it does not eliminate the risk of viral infections. Through its research, Clearant has found that 50kGy is the minimum dose needed for viral inactivation, though such a high dose will damage the tissue. However, when treated with its proprietary chemical process, Clearant tissue is able to safely withstand 50 kGy. The result is an allograft that is sterile with virus inactivation and that is biologically stable. Moreover, bone tissue treated with Clearant's method maintains its osteoinductive and osteoconductive activity, a key concern when irradiated.
Dru Willey, PhD, acting chief science officer of Clearant, notes that the studies the company has conducted have up to now shown that allografts treated with Clearant's procedure are just as effective as allografts treated without the Clearant Process, yet with the advantage of the tissues being sterilized. "What we provide is the assurance that even if an undetected infection is there, we're treating it with enough irradiation to make sure that there are no bacteria or viruses that would be transmitted with the allograft," says Willey.
Clearant's entire preparation and sterilization process takes 4 to 5 days. The treated tissues are then transported in a sealed, sterilized container. Clearant licenses its method to tissue banks, and recently began direct distribution of its own brand of sterile soft tissue and sterile cervical spinal allograft implants.
Deep freezing or Freeze drying, sealing and transport. Many tissue banks label their package contents as "sterile." This labeling has not been confirmed or validated and is currently under investigation by the FDA. The grafts are thawed out and rinsed in antibiotics minutes before use.
IMPORTANT: Allograft tissue processors are required to follow mandatory federal and state regulations. The FDA and only two states, FL and NY, require inspection and/or licensure of tissue processing facilities. As of 1/1/05, t here are 154 tissue banks in the U.S. and not all of them are certified.
Dr. Hyman only requests tissue from Tissue Banks Accredited by American Association of Tissue Banks.
The cost of the allograft tissue is borne by the Surgical Facility/Hospital, and they in turn try to get reimbursed for the cost from your Insurance Company. You do not pay for it.
Although the allograft tissue is and additional expense, using one saves the surgeon time and cutting down the time saves the facility money. In the end, it doesn't appear to add much to the cost of the surgery, and may make it less.
Primary ACL Reconstruction with Allograft. The cost of allograft tissue has been a concern in the past. A recent article by Cole and colleagues compared the costs associated with ACL reconstruction using either autograft or allograft. Patients underwent reconstruction using either bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft or freeze-dried Achilles tendon allograft. The hospital charge for ACL reconstruction was $4622 for allograft and $5694 for autograft (P < .0001). Allograft reconstruction of the ACL was significantly less expensive than autograft bone-patellar tendon-bone reconstruction. The difference in the cost was due to increased operating room time and a greater likelihood for overnight hospitalization in patients undergoing autograft ACL reconstruction.
From the January 2005 American Orthopaedic Society of Sports Medicine Meeting (AOSSM)on Allograft Tissue Safety in Atlanta, GA

(Most methods unsuitable for tissue)
You and your staff were so professional. In my job I work with a lot of physicians, and I've never met one who was so willing to take time to teach and ensure the patient understands. My wife and I are so grateful for your extra time to help us understand what we are facing.
– TJ & KJ


